I prefer more sharpness at the darkness!
Excessive sharps are harmful, this has long been clear to everyone.
Here the question is in understanding this and the manufacturer's reaction to this porridge of pixels.
You look at miniatures or full sizes on a small screen and you can immediately see that
some screenshots are less sharp. But as soon as we scale up to 100%, then everything
falls into place. Less sharp screenshots show the maximum level
details, and those that seemed sharp are hopelessly spoiled by a sharpe and lost in detail.
This is what producers & managers do in advertising. In YouTube reviews, the picture appears sharp and
detailed, but as soon as you start to watch the originals in full size,
then you involuntarily think: "Excuse me, but where is the quality???"...
There are illustrative examples for understanding the situation:
https://videoregforum.ru/threads/datakam-6.1744/page-377#post-129802
1.
Detail - the degree of elaboration (presence/absence) of the details themselves (not contours) in the picture.
That is, we see individual leaves - there is detail, we see a green mass instead of leaves - there is no detail.
2.
Sharpness - the clarity of the outlines, the general perception of the degree of clarity/blur of the picture.
And in fact, the combination of both parameters is important, but the first is much more important ...
Good article on this topic:
https://blog.andrewbondar.ru/rezkost-fotografii/
With all of the above, there are lovers of excessive sharpness...)